Environmental Impact of Municipal Solid Waste in Karachi City

WWW.HICLOVER.COMWaste Incinerators Auto Roll Air Filters
Nanjing Clover Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.

Tel:  +86-25-8461 0201   

Mobile: +86-13813931455(whatsapp/wechat)
Website: www.hiclover.com  
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]  

World Applied Sciences Journal 29 (12): 1516-1526, 2014

ISSN 1818-4952

© IDOSI Publications, 2014

DOI:  10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.12.1908

 

Environmental Impact of Municipal Solid Waste in Karachi City

 

1Muhammad Shahid, 1Yasmin Nergis, 1Shimim A. Siddiqui and 2Afzal Farooq Choudhry

 

1Environmental Research Center, Bahria University, Karachi Campus, Karachi-75260, Pakistan

2Department of Environmental Science, Federal Urdu University of Arts, Science and Technology, Gulshan-e-Iqbal Campus, Karachi-Pakistan

 

Abstract: Developing countries face serious problem in managing Municipal solid waste. The municipal solid waste generation rapidly increases in proportion to the rises in population and urbanization. A reliable estimate of the quantity and quality of municipal solid waste is very important for a proper planning and management of the municipal solid waste. This paper deals with the generation, composition of municipal solid waste (MSW) and their impact on the ground water contamination. The data of municipal solid waste generation and their composition was found during the month of November, 2011 to January, 2012. Our study suggests that 10,000 ton per day of municipal solid waste generated from Karachi city out of which 60% of the waste is dumped at the landfill site and rest of the 40% is left on the streets which disturb the aesthetic beauty of the Karachi city. Also, my study  examined municipal solid waste as well as ground water contamination around municipal landfill site in Karachi city. Sampling was carried out according to the spot sampling method of municipal solid waste as well as groundwater and analysis them physical and chemical parameters, such as, pH, TDS, Moisture Content, Total Hardness, Calcium (Ca), Magnesium (Mg), COD, Sodium (Na), Phosphorous (PO4), Potassium (K) and the metals like Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr) and Nickel (Ni) using analytical techniques. It has been found that most of the parameters of municipal solid waste and ground waste are beyond the permissible limits in accordance with the Pakistani Standards as well as Indian Standards. It is concluded that the contamination is due to the solid waste material that are dumped at the landfill site.

 

 

INTRODUCTION                                                 Solid waste  (SW) constitutes a huge  challenge for local  governments due to its constant increase and the

Developing countries face serious  problem  in  majority of  the  municipalities  do  not  keep  records  on managing solid wastes. The annual waste generation  waste generation, origin and characteristics. This lack of increases in proportion  to  the  rises  in  population  and  information  causes  that  the  decisions  regarding urbanization.  Rapid  urbanization,  development  and   proper   waste  management  are  based  on  assumption change of life style in the cities have also changed the and inferences, which brings about its mishandling generation rate and the  composition   of the municipal    with   serious     consequences     for     the  environment solid waste. (O. Buenrostro, et al., 2003) [2].

Solid  waste  other  than  hazardous  and  radioactive         World  population   continues   to   rise  with material are often referred to as municipal solid waste projections nearing 7.2 billion by 2015 (UNEP, 2005) [3]. (MSW). Municipal solid waste is useless  unwanted  The increasing volume of waste being generated would material  discharged   as    result   of   human   activity.   not be a problem if waste was viewed as a resource and Most commonly, they are solids, semi solid or liquids in        managed properly (UNEP, 2001) [4].

containers     thrown     out     of  houses,  commercial  or         Municipal  solid  waste  (MSW)  management  is  a industrial premises (Nyangababo, et al., 1980) [1].                highly neglected factor of environmental management in

 

Corresponding Author: Yasmin Nergis, Environmental Research Center, Bahria University, Karachi Campus, Karachi 75260, Pakistan. Cell:+92-345-2424832.


 

all     low       and      most      middle-income      countries        Experimental


(Murtaza, et al., 2000) [5]. Poorly managed waste stream are causing adverse environmental impact and may result in health hazards (Misra, et al., 2005) [6]. Environmental concerns are assuming ever-increasing importance in the MSW decision-making process (Elizabeth, 1998) [7]. Appropriate waste management strategies  can substantially reduce the burden placed on the environment. If the waste management system is based on sound data and is well executed with public awareness, it can reduce emission and resource depletion (Jurczak, 2003, [8] Woodard, et al., 2004 [9]). Global generation of municipal solid waste in 1997 was 0.49 billion tones with an estimated annual growth rate of 3.2-4.5%  in developed nations and 2-3% in developing nations (Suocheng, et al., 2001) [10]. Inappropriate management of urban solid waste not only increases the pollution to the environment, but also threatens human health through its collection, transfer and disposal processes (Dong, et al., 2001) [11].

Landfills have been identified as one of the major threat to groundwater resources (Fatta, et al., 1999; [12] USEPA, 1984 [13]). Waste placed in landfill or open dumps are subjected to either groundwater underflow or infiltration from precipitation. The dumped solid wastes gradually release its initial interstitial water and some of its decomposition by-product gets into water moving through the waste deposit. Such liquid containing innumerable organic and inorganic compounds is called leachate. This leachate accumulates at the bottom of the landfill and percolates through the soil. Areas near landfill have a greater possibility of groundwater contamination because of the potential pollution source of leachate originating from the nearby site. Such contamination of groundwater resource poses a substantial risk to local resource user and to the natural environment. The impact of landfill leachate on the surface and groundwater has given rise to a number of studies in recent years (Saarela,   2003;   [14]   Abu-Rukah,   et   al., 2001; [15]

Looser, et al.,  1999;  [16]  Christensen,  et al., 1998; [17]

De Rosa, et al., 1996; [18] Flyhammar, 1995 [19]).

In the present study, it was estimated that the generation  of  municipal  solid   waste   and  their impact on the ground water at the landfill site of Karachi city. Various physico-chemical parameters including heavy metals were analyzed of  municipal solid waste as  well  as  groundwater  and  the  quantity of municipal solid waste  generated  by  the  Karachi city.


Study Area: Karachi is the biggest city in Pakistan having population is more than nineteen (19) million. It comprises 18 Union Councils (U.C), Karachi generates municipal solid waste more than 10,000 tons per day, 60% of that waste is dumped at the landfill site and the 40% remains on the streets, which is not properly collected. There are two official landfill sites JAM CHAKRO, near Surjani town and GOND PASS, near Hub river road and two unofficial landfill sites are IBRAHIM HYDERI and REHRI GOTH landfill sites; these sites are 30 to 35 Km away from the city centre.

It was found that the municipal solid waste of 14 towns of the Karachi city is dumped at JAM CHAKRO landfill site and the municipal solid waste of remaining 04 towns is dumped at GOND PASS. On the landfill sites the municipal solid waste (mixed garbage) is brought through uncovered vehicles comes from the different areas of the cities and dumped openly without any segregation and discipline.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

The survey was  conducted during the month of Nov-2011 to Jan-2012, because the ground water gets polluted due to solid waste dumping nearer to the location.

 

Weight of Municipal Solid Waste Generate in the Karachi City: For calculating the exact amount of waste generated from eighteen  (18)  town  of  the Karachi city. The sites were monitored and it was noted how many tracks dump the waste at landfill sites. For the calculation of exact weight of municipal solid waste (mixed garbage), first noted the weight of the municipal solid waste with the truck (W1), then weight of truck. (W2), after dumped of the waste, using the weighing bridge.

 

Weight of waste (mixed garbage) = weight of waste with truck-weight of truck

 

Or,

W (in ton) = W1   W2

 

In this way, note the assessed weight of municipal solid waste (mixed garbage) town wise is shown in Appendix-I.


 

Physical Composition of Municipal Solid Waste: For this the entire crucible in an oven for one hr at 105°C, cool it in purpose, first identified the specific town then calculated      to the desicator and then note the weight of the crucible the weight of municipal solid waste (mixed garbage) by        plus sample (W3).

subtracting the weight of   truck from the loaded truck,       The percent moisture content is calculated by using

then  the  mixed  garbage  was  dumped  on  the  cleaned     the following formula, covered area was segregated. After that the weights of


the segregated were noted separately and then calculated the percentages. The same procedure was repeated for the rest of the towns respectively.


Moisture Content (%)= (W2 W1) (W3 W1)

(W2 W1)

 

For heavy metal analysis, procedure is to take 1 gm of


Chemical   Composition   of   Municipal   Solid   Waste              the dry sample of the solid waste in a beaker and add Sampling of Solid Waste: A sample from the municipal           100ml of distilled water in the beaker, after that place it on solid waste (mixed garbage) was taken by means of spot                         the Hot Plate and add 20 ml Aqua Regia (mixture of 75 ml sampling  method  (take  a  sample  at  random  from  the            HCL + 25 ml HNO3; ratio of 3:1) and mix it well. Then take source);  first  pointed  out  the  loaded  truck  and  then         20 ml of Aqua-Regia and add it into the sample of 100 ml, dumped  it  on  the  clean  covered  smooth  surface,  from             when the sample remain of 5 ml add 2-3 drops of HCL and where was taken 50 kg amount of municipal solid waste                       then immediately stop heating and makeup up to 100 ml (mixed garbage) 50-60 kg. After that, segregated it and                                    and then filter it through filter paper No. 42 and collect it different  type  of  composition  was  taken  out  from  the                into the conical flask (100 ml), make up it into the 100 ml. mixed garbage and then took a sample on random basis                                     After  that,    give    the  sample  No  of  the  collected from the waste about 1 kg for further analysis. The same             sample   respectively.   Before   run   it   on   the   Atomic procedure is repeated for sample   collection   from   06             Absorption, THERMO SCIENTIFIC, ICE-3000 SERIES different trucks which came from different part of the city.        ATOMIC  ABSORPTION,  first  standardize  the  Atomic After  that,  the  samples  were immediately send to        Absorption  by  mean  of  the  standard  solution  of  the

the lab and were stored in a refrigerator at 4°C. Chemical          required  metal  having  0.1  ppm,  10 ppm and 100 ppm, parameters    analyzed    from   municipal  solid   waste          then find out the value of trace metal such as, Lead (Pb), (mixed    garbage)         include       pH,     moisture  content,                 Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni), Sodium (Na) Sodium,   Phosphorous   and       Potassium.   Also   were             and Potassium (K) of the digest sample of the solid waste. determine the heavy metal like, Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd),                                   And     Phosphorous    is     estimated   by   using   of Chromium (Cr) and Nickel. The pH was calculated by                 Hack-DR-2800    spectrophotometer    and    Hack    8114, using HACH-SENSION 156 METER.                                                  Molybduvanadate method and fixed it at program. No 480. Moisture   content   of   the   solid   waste   sample,     Where 25 ml sample is mixed with 10 ml Molybduvanadate procedure is to take the weight of clean empty dry plate                                and set timer for three (3), min. After three (3) min get

by electronic balance, after that take 100 gm wet sample of required value in mg/l. This is shown in the Table 3. solid waste and put it on the clean dry steel plate and note

the weight of sample with plate and then place in an oven    Physical   and   Chemical   Characteristic   of   Ground at 40°C for 24 hrs respectively. After drying the sample,         Watersampling  of  Groundwater:  Bore  wells  at  the note the weight of the dry sample. The dry samples are             different  location  are  in  operation  within  2  to  2.5  km transferred  into  the clean polyethylene  bag, sealed and                 around the landfill site, i.e. JAM CHAKRO. Sample of numbered accordingly.                                                                  groundwater at 06 different locations at various distance To  calculate  the  moisture  content  in  the  sample,                   from  the  landfill  were  taken,  during  the  month  of procedure is to taken an empty crucible, clean it and then   November, 2011. Sample were stored in a cold storage

put it in the oven for 30 min to dry at 93.5°C, after that, put        bath and immediately transferred to the lab.

the hot crucible  in  the desicator for cooling. Then note      After sampling, the samples were urgently send to the weight of the clean dry crucible (W1)) and then take 1     the   lab   and   were   stored   in a refrigerator at   4°C. gm of the dry sample of the solid waste from the sealed Physical parameters such as pH and Total dissolved polyethylene bag put it in the dry crucible and note the Solid (TDS) were analyzed of the groundwater by using weight  of  the  crucible  plus sample(W2).  After that put        HACH-SENSION 156 METER.


 

In case of chemical parameters, which were analysis    Molydbduvanadate and set timer for three (3), min. After of  the  sample  in  which  includes,  Total  Hardness  as   three (3) min get the required value in mg/l.

CaCO3, Calcium (Ca) and  Magnesium (Mg) is estimated

by using DIGITAL TITRATO (HACH). MODEL. NO.                           RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

16900.  In  this  method  take  10  ml  of  a  sample  in  a

measuring cylinder and add distilled water up to 100ml,   Current Status of MSW Generated in Karachi City: after then transfer it into   the conical flask and titrate it    Karachi  is  divided  into  five  zones  (east,  west,  south, and find out the Total Hardness as CaCO3, Calcium (Ca)     central and malir), eighteen (18) towns and 178 union and Magnesium (Mg). By using this meter, take a dilution councils. Karachi city generated more than 10,000 ton / factor (1:10) and also multiplied by the correction factor day of municipal solid waste and dumped at the landfill which is mathematically represented as,        site without proper planning and segregation. Out of the

total amount of municipal solid waste 60% 0f the total


Ca (mg/l) = (X) * 10 * 0.4 = Y1 T.H (mg/l) = (X) * 10 = Y2


amount of municipal solid waste are dumped on the landfill site and rest of 40% remain on the street and did not collect from the towns. During the month of November, 2011 to December, 2012 survey was conducted


And for Magnesium,                                                              and find out amount of garbage dumped at the landfill site.


we subtract from Y2    to Y1


as, Mg (mg/l) = Y2


Y1


Out of 18 town only eleven town such as, Gulshan, Gulberg, Gaddap, Korangi, Liaquatabad, Landhi, Malir,


Also, calculate COD for the ground water by using       North-Nazimabad, North  Karachi,  Shah Faisal and  Bin DIGITAL REACTOR BLOCK-DRB-200. In this method                       Qasim towns dumped their garbage at the Jam Chakro use prepared vial 1500 and add 2 ml sample and run for 2                                 landfill site and too much without any proper planning hrs at 150°C after 2 hrs take it out and put it for cool and                                   and  segregation  of  the  garbage.  Amongst  them,  Bin again placed it in the spectrophotometer. i.e., Spectro-DR-             Qasim town does not dumped at the official landfill site; 2800 and fixed at Program. No- 435-Program. Then get the                                  instead it dumped solid waste close to the town at kachra value of the COD level in the ground water in mg/l.                                                kundhi. This is because  Bin  Qasim town is too far from For the trace of metal contents, take 100ml sample of                              the Jam Chakro landfill site and the cost trip is too high. groundwater and digest it. And placed it on the Hot Plate                                               Therefore,  CDGK  has  a  plan  to  construct  an  official and add 20 ml of Aqua-Regia (mixture of 75 ml HCL + 25 ml         landfill  sites near  the Bin  Qasim town.  The  town that HNO3; ratio of 3:1) and mix it well. then takes 20 ml of                           dumped their solid waste at the Jam Chakro landfill site is

Aqua-Regia and adds it into the sample of 100 ml, when        shown in the Table1 and Table 2.

the sample remain of 5 ml add 2-3 drops of HCL and then            Rest of four towns dump their waste at the Gond Pass immediately stop heating and makeup up to 100 ml and                         landfill town near  Hub  River due to its being much near then filter it through filter paper No. 42 and collect it into                          to  the  town  as  compared  to  Jam  Chakro landfill site. the conical flask (100 ml), make up it into the 100 ml.                 The towns which dumped at the Goud Pass landfill sites Then  gives  the  sample No accordingly. Before run                         such as Baldia town, Kemari town, Lyari town and Orangi

it on the Atomic Absorption, THERMO SCIENTIFIC, town, during sampling it was observed that the municipal ICE-3000 SERIES ATOMIC ABSORPTION, first  solid waste (mixed garbage) generated by these towns, standardized  the  Atomic  Absorption  by  mean  of  the        which indicates in the Table 3.

standard solution of  the  required metal having 0.1 ppm,                 Three towns   of   them i.e., Jamshed town, Sadder 10 ppm and 100 ppm and then run the prepared sample              town   and   S.I.T.E town are those that   dumped   their accordingly and find out the value of trace metal such as,         waste at both landfill sites.  C.D.G.K trucks collect the Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr) and Nickel (Ni),              municipal solid waste from roadside, Street of the town in the groundwater.                                                                                                    and other places to transport it to the nearest landfill sites. And             phosphorous    is     estimate    by   using of        Sadder  town and Jamshed town consists of 11 and 13 Hack-DR-2800    spectrophotometer    and    Hack    8114,              Union Councils and both the towns comprise big market Molydbduvanadate   method   and  fixed  it  at  program.                   of the city that produce huge amount of mixed garbage No  480.  Where  25  ml  sample  is  mixed  with  10  ml              such  as,  house hold garbage as well as market garbage.


 

Table 1: Weight of MSW dumped on jam chakro landfill site, Karachi

 

(1)                   (2)                  (3)                  (4)                  (5)                  (6)

 

 

 

 

Date

—————————————————————————————————————–

Weight (In Ton/ per day)

—————————————————————————————————————–

 

 

Total Trips (per day

 

 

Total Weights (Ton / day)

21-Nov

470. 5

248. 82

0

0

181.31

603.3

94

1503. 93

22-Nov

359. 46

310. 51

292. 7

155. 32

157.29

211.15

136

1486. 43

23-Nov

569. 3

231. 72

44. 59

184. 27

187.22

220.98

142

1438. 08

24-Nov

527. 05

247. 35

32. 14

211. 59

211.59

351.44

138

1581. 16

25-Nov

435. 24

161. 99

188. 24

281. 1

202.01

364.83

161

1633. 41

12-Dec

385. 32

242. 46

199. 32

324. 01

180.61

341.96

165

1673. 68

13-Dec

492. 07

218. 53

137. 13

386

256.18

384.08

168

1873. 99

14-Dec

356. 45

349. 25

215. 74

554. 52

278.5

679.12

211

2433. 58

15-Dec

602. 3

274. 43

266. 97

492. 07

287.52

612.58

218

2535. 87

16-Dec

593. 84

454. 5

256. 74

494

272.24

566.58

234

2637. 9

2-Jan

358. 17

380. 22

0

441. 06

15.79

373.44

125

1568. 68

3-Jan

265. 09

378. 5

205. 2

325. 69

323.86

293.57

175

1791. 91

4-Jan

256. 98

328. 45

129. 33

106. 65

362.2

479.29

158

1662. 9

5-Jan

539. 5

410. 67

97. 82

331. 4

493.84

377.78

191

2251. 01

6-Jan

456

380. 22

127. 95

303. 62

420.09

230.19

169

1918. 07

Total Amount

6667. 27

4617. 62

2193. 87

4591. 3

3830. 25

6090. 29

2485

27990. 6

Average Amount

444. 48

307. 84

146. 25

306. 08

255. 35

406. 01

 

 

(1)=Gulshan Town, (2)=Gulberg Town, (3)=Gaddap Town, (4)=Korangi Town, (5)=Liaquatabad Town, (6)=Landhi Town

 

 

Table 2: Weight of garbage dumped on jam chakro landfill site, Karachi

 

(1)                     (2)                       (3)                     (4)                        (5)

 

———————————————————————————————————-

Weight (In Ton/ per day)

Date                                     ———————————————————————————————————-

 

 

Total Trips (per day)

 

 

Total Weights (Ton / day)

21-Nov

217.7

330.83

297.88

237.95

0

156

1084.36

22-Nov

212.45

311.56

300.82

283.77

0

174

1108.6

23-Nov

176.17

587.9

284.9

239.64

30

183

1288.61

24-Nov

193.67

326.49

221.3

235.84

0

85

977.3

25-Nov

287.28

494.84

360.25

274.41

0

193

1416.78

12-Dec

301.65

509.07

452.32

223.11

0

191

1486.15

13-Dec

270.18

423.99

371.15

246.3

0

186

1311.62

14-Dec

202.88

462.92

323.3

257.97

0

160

1247.07

15-Dec

205.18

344.09

320.35

263.15

0

167

1132.77

16-Dec

234.83

380.45

353.2

271.26

0

172

1239.74

2-Jan

231.08

228.71

128.29

207.47

0

70

795.55

3-Jan

239.1

468.47

456.58

191.92

0

206

1356.07

4-Jan

196.21

384.5

462.09

217.81

0

199

1260.61

5-Jan

229.01

361.56

375.23

202.75

0

177

1168.55

6-Jan

237.83

483.68

363.07

263.61

0

192

1348.19

Total Amount

3435.22

6099.06

5070.73

3616.96

0

2511

18221.97

Average Amount

229.01

406.604

338.04

241.13

0

 

 

(1)=Malir Town, (2)=North Nazimabad Town, (3)=North Karachi Town, (4)=Shah Faisal Town, (5)=Bin Qasim Town


 

Table 3: Weight of garbage dumped on Gond pass landfill site, Karachi

 

(1)                           (2)                           (3)                            (4)

 

 

——————————————————————————————–

Weight (In Ton/ per day)

 

Total Trips

 

Total Weights

Date

——————————————————————————————–

(per day

(Ton / day)

21-Nov

273.9

147.2

0

0

51

421.1

22-Nov

255

92.66

284

76.49

95

708.15

23-Nov

266.9

88.04

498.99

0

114

853.93

24-Nov

0

187.76

356.04

300.12

78

843.92

25-Nov

300.13

81.81

406.05

331.91

133

1119.9

12-Dec

472.54

70.07

374.64

323.15

128

1240.4

13-Dec

480.41

82.79

379.663

434.94

131

1377.803

14-Dec

502.34

73.5

446.52

387.46

131

1409.82

15-Dec

449.21

163.27

431.03

301.97

153

1345.48

16-Dec

532.97

92.6

580.81

323.18

173

1529.56

2-Jan

429.95

49.46

149.92

341.51

101

970.84

3-Jan

456.06

66.32

500.99

363.68

145

1387.05

4-Jan

230.77

87.69

566.29

326.2

135

1210.95

5-Jan

261.97

84.05

115.94

246.7

87

708.66

6-Jan

679.06

19.23

318.65

454.85

132

1471.79

Total Amount

5591.21

1386.45

5409.53

4212.16

1787

16599.353

Average Amount

372.74

92.43

360.63

280.81

 

 

(1)=Baldia Town, (2)=Kemari Town, (3)=Layari Town (4)=Orangi Town

 

 

Table 4: Weight of garbage dumped on Jam chakro and Gond pass landfill site, Karachi

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

———————-

———————

——————–

——————

(J)                       (G)

(J)                     (G)

(J)                      (G)

(J)                  (G)

——————————————————————————————————————

Weight (In Ton/ per day)

Date                                  ——————————————————————————————————————                                                                           Total Trips (per day       Total Weights (Ton / day)

 

21-Nov

344.0

0.0

0.0

243.2

78.7

110.7

592.0

410.3

201.0

1778.9

22-Nov

534.8

46.2

90.1

195.8

302.6

13.0

532.7

373.0

265.0

2088.2

23-Nov

743.5

0.0

292.7

197.2

0.0

0.0

255.8

358.6

279.0

1847.7

24-Nov

437.0

51.1

0.0

0.0

338.7

0.0

246.1

349.4

193.0

1422.3

25-Nov

782.7

0.0

74.3

143.7

0.0

4.5

47.6

508.4

292.0

1561.1

12-Dec

572.9

16.2

93.1

178.9

354.2

1.7

294.5

430.5

270.0

1941.9

13-Dec

912.2

0.0

195.6

54.1

393.5

2.5

299.5

433.8

299.0

2291.0

14-Dec

628.2

13.5

62.5

438.7

292.9

2.5

265.1

479.4

279.0

2182.8

15-Dec

646.8

0.0

113.4

311.5

276.6

0.0

145.5

569.6

283.0

2063.4

16-Dec

717.7

0.0

69.9

357.4

401.8

2.0

114.2

580.8

301.0

2243.7

2-Jan

394.3

0.0

0.0

240.3

345.5

0.0

22.0

0.0

112.0

1002.0

3-Jan

533.0

0.0

153.2

407.4

358.5

0.0

99.6

618.0

295.0

2169.8

4-   Jan

682.4

0.0

245.4

236.3

389.2

4.7

65.3

0.0

215.0

1623.2

5-   Jan

438.4

0.0

100.4

281.8

466.9

0.0

63.4

0.0

157.0

1350.9

6-   Jan

358.0

5.9

67.7

257.6

641.7

64.2

32.4

32.4

224.0

1459.8

Total Amount

8725.6

132.9

1558.4

3543.8

4640.6

205.7

3075.7

5144.2

3665.0

27026.9

Average Amount

581.7

8.9

103.9

236.3

309.4

13.7

205.0

324.9

 

 

(1)= Jamshed Town, (2)= Saddar Town, (3)= S.I.T.E Town,(4)= C.D.G.K (J)= Jam Chakro, (G) = Gond Pass

 

 

Similarly,  S.I.T.E  town                                                  consists  of  nine  Union    total garbage generated) are as follow: 4788.25, 5391.33, Council and comprises largest industrial zone of Karachi      5428.33, 4824.68, 5731.23,  6342.12, 6854.443, 7273.3,

city.This  town  also  generates  huge  amount  of  garbage    7077.56, 7650.94, 4337.11, 6704.81, 5757.7, 5479.13 and that is dumped at both the city landfill sites (Table 4). 6197.84 ton / day was collected and dumped at two landfill Some of the figure giving the amount of mixed garbage site and rest 40% mixed garbage was not collected and collected and dumped per day at landfill sites (60% of the        dumped at two landfill sites and rest of the 40% is not


 

collected from the towns that remains on the streets of           According to the record, amount of municipal solid Karachi city. Unfortunately, the dumping  at  the  two  waste generated and filled in 2006 were 6113 tons and landfill sites is without proper planning and segregation       5057 tons/day respectively, while 1057 tons remained on of the garbage, which not only adversely  affected  the  the streets of the city. Survey conducted by us in Nov-11 aesthetic beauty of the Karachi city, but also causes bad  to Jan-2012 showed that the amount of lifted solid waste odor, serious diseases and the bad  impact  on  the  was 8907.27 ton / day. This indicates that the amount of environment. According to the Pak-EPA, (2005) [20] the the MSW generated and lifted has almost doubled over a mixed garbage generated from the different areas varies  period of 5 years. 60% of MSW dumped at the landfill site from 1.896 kg/house/day to 4.29 kg/house/day in a few and 40% of MSW did not collect from the town it shows major areas of the city.                                                                  that municipal solid waste increases 50% from 2006.

An average amount (ton per 15 days) of the mixed

garbage generated by each individual town is: Gulshan  Composition of Municipal Solid Waste Generated in 444.48, Gulberg 307.84, Gaddap 146.25, Korangi 306.08,                         Karachi City: It is has found that, the mixed municipal Liaquatabad 255.35, Landhi 406.01, Malir 229.01, North                                          solid waste (MSW) comprises food waste, kitchen waste, Nazimabad  406.60,  North  Karachi  338.04,  Shah  Faisal        green  waste,  paper  waste,  plastic  waste,  glasses,  can,, 241.13, Bin Qasim 0, Baldia 372.74,  Kemari  92.43,  Lyari  metal,  plastic,  dirt,  rock,  clothing,  tetra  pack,  debris, 360.63, Orangi town 280.81, 590.56, 340.14, 323.08, 529.98       lighting             bulb,    sand    and    wood/board   and    other tons. From  the  tables  it  is indicated that Sadder town                     miscellaneous  items.  Composition  is  an  important  tool  and Gulshan town produced higher amount of municipal   which help us in deciding about the treatment to be given solid waste (MSW) than the other towns.                                                                     to the given to   the M|SW. Particularly about the reuse In 2006, CDGK solid waste management department                                and  recycling  of certain  composition  of  the  waste.  also  estimated  the  amount  of  municipal  solid  waste                During, the studies in November, 2011 to January, 2012, generated and actual amount lifting and the amount that                  the   garbage   from   individual   towns   was   categorized remained   unattended   to.   These   values   have   been  according to its composition. It was found out as to what compared  with  the  values  obtained  during  the  survey  percentage each fraction or category of the garbage was conducted in November, 2011 to January, 2012 for the  generated in different towns. Proportion and kind of the

present study. The comparison has been shown Table 5.        components of varies from town to town.

 

Table 5: Comparison of MSW generated in Karachi city in 2006 and 2011-12

 

 

S. No

 

Name of Towns

MSW Generated in 2006

Actual Liftingper day(in ton)

Blocklogper day (in ton)

Actual Lifting Of MSW In 2011-2012

01

Gulshan Town

400

318

82

593.84

02

Gulberg Towm

330

330

0

410.67

03

Gaddap Town

350

320

30

266.97

04

Korangi Town

360

272

88

554.52

05

Liaquatabad Town

800

594

206

493.84

06

Landhi Town

370

324

46

679.12

07

Malir Town

280

270

10

301.65

08

North Nazimabad Town

375

336

39

587.9

09

North Karachi Town

365

280

85

462.09

10

Shah Faisal Town

105

105

283.77

11

Bin Qasim Town

65

27

38

0

12

Baldia Town

400

302

99

679.06

13

Kemari Town

220

180

40

163.27

14

Layari Town

350

300

50

580.81

15

Orangi Town

346

240

106

454.85

16

Jamshed Town

330

525

78

958.38

17

Sadder Town

500

454

46

684.15

18

S.I.T.E Town

167

153

14

752.38

 

Total Amount

6113

5057

1057

8907.27


 

Table 6: Physical COMPOSITION OF waste of MSW generated in Karachi city

 

(1)                     (2)                  (3)                  (4)                 (5)                  (6)                 (7)                 (8)                 (9)

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Weight (In Kilograms)

Name of Fraction            ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Kitchen

150.2

96.2

186.2

181

200.5

146.2

180.2

230.2

110

Green

110.7

75.3

95.3

101

110.3

105.3

125.3

135.3

85.3

Paper

37.1

27.5

57.5

27.1

47.2

47.5

67.5

87.5

57.5

Glass

76.3

25.6

55.6

56.3

36.2

35.6

35.6

55.6

15.6

Metal

5

1

9

8

2

8

14

12

11.6

Plastic

37.4

35.3

65.3

47.3

57.1

55.3

35.3

45.3

25.3

Dirt

20.1

16.2

26.2

18.1

28.2

16.2

24.2

14.2

14.2

Nappies

61

51.3

41.3

51.6

41.4

51.3

71.3

61.3

51.3

Clothing

20.7

38.5

48.5

18.5

28.5

58.5

62.5

72.5

35.5

Tetra Pack

86.8

41.4

51.4

71.7

51.4

41.4

61.4

81.4

41.4

Wood /Board

47.4

14.1

20.1

17.1

13.1

18.1

21.1

22.1

20.1

TotalWeight

647.3

422.4

656.4

597

616

583.4

698.4

817

468

(1)= Liaquatabad Town, (2)= Lyari Town, (3)= Malir Town, (4)= North Nazimzmbad Town, (5)= North Karachi Town, (6)= Orangi Town, (7)= Shah Faisal Town, (8)= SaddarTown, (9)= S.I.T.E Town

 

Table 7: Physical COMPOSITION OF waste of MSW generated in Karachi city

 

(1)                     (2)                  (3)                  (4)                 (5)                  (6)                 (7)                 (8)                 (9)

————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Weight (In Kilograms)

Name of Fraction             ————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

 

Kitchen

119.1

72.1

112.5

175.5

265.4

190.8

89.8

100.6

118.2

Green

75.3

65.3

105.3

80.4

120.5

120.6

45.6

85.2

100.3

Paper

47.5

37.5

27.5

37.2

67.1

77.2

17.2

27.1

37.1

Glass

28.6

18.6

14.6

15.1

16.1

25.1

20.1

28.6

18.6

Metal

7

10.2

1

3

4

9

2

3

6

Plastic

15.3

16.3

14.3

47.3

67.5

67.3

57.3

77.3

45.3

Dirt

12.2

18.2

15.2

28.2

38.2

38.2

18.2

20.2

12.2

Nappies

61.3

71.3

61.3

31.4

71.4

71.4

31.4

51.4

41.3

Clothing

23.5

55.5

45.5

38.5

48.5

48.5

28.5

38.5

48.5

Tetra Pack

31.4

51.4

61.4

61.4

71.4

51.4

41.4

61.4

51.4

Wood/ Board

10.1

11.1

15.1

15.1

10.1

17.1

7.1

27.1

12.1

Total Weight

431.3

427.5

473.7

533.1

770.2

716.6

358.6

520.4

491

(1)= Baldia Town, (2)= Bin Qasim Town, (3)= Gadap Town, (4)= Gulberg Town, (5)= Gulshan Town, (6)= Jamshed Town, (7)= Kemari Town, (8)= Korangi Town, (9)= Landhi Town

 

For example, some town produced large amount of   anaerobic  degradation  it contributes to global warming kitchen waste, green waste, paper plastic, tetra pack as                 by the produced methane.

against larger amounts of dirt debris, metal, clothing and            During the survey conducted for the present study wood produced by some other towns. The nature of the the composition of municipal solid waste and percentages garbage   produced   depends   upon  the  type   of   the   of various components or categories of the waste were locality you are dealing with; for example residential vs. determined town wise. Thos indicates that 80% of the commercial, poor and middle class residents vs. upper  waste  comprised  recyclable  materials  such  as  paper, class and well to do class of residents. Compositions also    plastic,  glass  and  metal  fraction  and  rest  of  20%  was help in separating the recyclable articles from the other   organic  type  waste.  This  indicates  in  the  following type of the material such as organic type and some other        table 6 and Table 7,

that  can  be  used  for  composting.  According  to  the It was observed  during the survey, that the waste Ahmed, et. al., (2002) [21], organic waste are also picker or scavengers were mostly Afghani. They picked responsible  for  pollution   of  soil  and  water  bodies   up  most  of  the  recyclable  or  reuse  material  from  the through  leachate  and  in  the  process  of  uncontrolled        municipal  solid   waste.   These   scavengers   collect  the


( Na )                  (PO4)               (K)                     (Pb)                 (Cd)               (Cr)                (Ni)

————————————————————————————————————————————–

mg/kg

S. #                pH                    M.C (%)             ————————————————————————————————————————————–

 

SW1

8.21

1.35

12875.58

1370

609.57

107.2

4.74

58.93

100.8

SW2

7.9

1.36

11129.49

1310

449.99

149.7

5.07

63.66

103.6

SW3

8.11

1.33

8154.69

1290

450.26

168.5

4.78

104.5

116.8

SW4

7.98

1.57

10525

1460

563.03

159.2

4.58

92.99

112.3

SW5

7.92

1.46

9668.03

1160

249.22

159.1

3.75

102

111

SW6

7.99

1.66

8125.05

1280

442.02

180.4

4.53

100.9

117

S 1*

5.5-9.0

No Specs

100

5

50

15

 

 

 

S 2**

5.5-8.0

<50

—-

 

 

 

 

 

 

M.C indicates Moisture Content, All values in (mg/kg) except pH and moisture content, Sodium (Na), Phosphate (PO4), Potassium (K), Lead (Pb), Cadmium (Cd), Chromium (Cr), Nickel (Ni)

*S 1 (Indian Standard 1) = *MSW (Manag Handling) Rule 2000.

** S 2 (Standard 2) = **Zucconin and deBertoldi, 1987 standard

 

 

waste from door to door as well as from the kachra-kundhi  damage. Landfill leachates  are  the major source of hazard (dust bins), sort it out and keep  the  portion  with  worth    to   the   environment.   Several   cases   of   groundwater and throw away the rest carelessly, which is littered on        pollution from landfill leachates were reported.

the  streets,  become  stinky,  cause  ugliness  and  health                                  The analytical result shows that pH of Table-1 and hazards.                                                                    Tabl;e-3  slightly  alkaline  and  the  moisture  content  is It has been survey of 18 towns that the solid waste       favorable for composting. Also, heavy metal contents of mostly comprising, kitchen waste, garden waste, nappies                 the   municipal              solid   waste   collected   at   different and  clothing materials is largely  produced by the high                                location (on random basis) have been shown in Table 8. income residential areas,  whereas  organic type of waste The  concentration  of  Lead,  Cadmium,  Chromium  and      is   generally  generated  from  the    vegetable  markets.                 Nickel are comparatively high. The analytical results of The towns that includes like Sadder town, Jamshed  town,  the contents of the above metals, when compared with Gulberg town and Gulshan-e- Iqbal towns produced waste                 standards, shown that the   concentration of metal such with  greater  amount  of  paper,  plastic,  glass  and  some                               as, lead, Cadmium, Chromium and Nickel were beyond the

amount  of  metals.  Liaquatabad  town  generated  waste      permissible limits for drinking water. consisting dominantly of wood/Board material The nature

(composition) of solid waste generated in various towns       Study the Ground Water near about the Landfill Site: of the city largely depends upon the social status of the Landfills have been identified as one of the major threat to inhabitants and the types of the markets occurring there.        groundwater resources (Fatta, et al., 1999; USEPA, 1984).

Open dumping of mixed garbage is a threat to the surface Study the Quality of Municipal Solid  Waste  in  the  water as well as underground water and the surrounding Vicinity of Landfill Site: In order to characterized the environment. The dumped solid wastes gradually release municipal solid waste at a landfill pH, moisture content, their initial interstitial water and some of its decomposition sodium, phosphate, potassium and heavy metal contents   by-products  get  into  water  moving  through  the  waste were determined (Table 8). Heavy metal remain unaffected  deposit. Such  a  liquid containing innumerable organic during  degradation of organic waste and become toxic  and inorganic compound is called Leachate. This leachate when the concentration of  heavy  metal  exceeding  a  accumulates at the bottom of the landfill and percolates certain limits. In case of the compost from solid waste        through the soil.

being used as manure then heavy metals are subject to          Groundwater near the landfill sites becomes bioaccumulation and may cause risk to human health, as    contamination    because    of    the    potential    pollution they  are  transferred to the food chain. Exposure to heavy  source  of   leachate   originating   from the nearby site. metal may cause blood and bone  disorders,  kidney  Such  contamination  of  groundwater  resource  poses  a damage and decreased mental capacity and  neurological        substantial  risk  to users and to the natural environment.

 

1524


 

Table 9: Physico-chemical characterization of ground water sample

 

pH               (TD S)          (T. H)           (Ca)              (Mg)                (CO D)          (Pb)               (Cd)             (Cr)             (Ni)

—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

mg/l

Sample #                   —————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

 

GW1

7.06

1095

830

112

297.3

67

0.10

0.04

0.31

0.17

GW2

7.28

1488

800

116

283.2

70

0.11

0.04

0.32

0.16

GW3

7.36

1486

600

136

192.1

68

0.09

0.03

0.42

0.15

GW4

7.36

1489

680

128

228.5

71

0.16

0.04

0.42

0.17

GW5

7.42

1472

700

144

230.2

66

0.12

0.04

0.32

0.17

GW6

7.41

1486

820

152

276.6

80

0.08

0.03

0.32

0.17

Pak. STD.*

6.5-8.5

< 1000

< 500

= 0.05

0.01

= 0.05

=0.02

Ind. STD.**

300

75

30

20

Total Hardness (T.H),Calcium (Ca),Magnesium (Mg),Lead (Pb),Cadmium (Cd),Chromium (Cr),Nickel (Ni), (COD) Chemical Oxygen Demand, All values in (mg/l) except pH, Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

*Pakistan Standard values for Pakistan

** Indian Standard Value

 

 

The impact of landfill leachate on the surface and 178 Union Council. Of the total amount of municipal solid groundwater has been  discussed  in  several  studies  in  waste 60% is dumped at the landfill sites and rest of the recent years. Our landfill  sites are  old and municipal  40% remain littered on the street of the city, which not waste is openly dumped  at  the landfill sites without  only spoils the face of the city but also becomes a stake taking any kind of precautions.  Due to  which leachate        for the health of its citizens.

migrate from municipal waste towards the groundwater          Out of total  municipal  solid  waste  generated, table and contaminate it. Therefore,  the  physical  and  80%  contains  recyclable  material  and  the  remaining chemical  characteristics  of  the  groundwater  occurring        20 % is organic type waste.

near the landfill sites have been examined and the values            On the basis of analysis of the municipal solid waste, are  shown  in  the  Table  9.  These  values  have  been it  is  found  that  the  pH  is  slightly  alkaline,  moisture compared with the NEQS standard.                         content is less than 50% and the amount of heavy metal This    showed    that    the    groundwater    near    the     like,  Lead,  Cadmium,  Chromium and Nickel are beyond landfill  site  is  polluted  with  the  leachate  derived  from   the  permissible  limits.  They  are responsible  for casting   the  municipal solid waste. The pH of ground water is   bad   impacts   on   the   environment   as   well   as   for slightly alkaline  and  the  TDS,  total  hardness,  calcium,    contaminating groundwater in the vicinity of the landfill

magnesium  and  the   values  of   COD   is  beyond  the        sites through leachate forming.

permissible limits.                                                                                    The  pH  of  groundwater  is  slightly  alkaline  and Results of heavy metal analysis were compared with   Hardness of ground water is due to the leaching of both

the  standard  values.  It  was  found  that  the  values  of        Ca and Mg into the groundwater Table.

concentration of Lead, cadmium, Chromium and Nickel are        Heavy metals contents in the groundwater like beyond the permissible limits of the ground water and Lead, Cadmium, Chromium and Nickel are beyond the ground water is unfit for the use of domestic purpose as        permissible limits.

well  as  for  the  agricultural  purpose.  Therefore,  it  is

necessary to make a proper plan to enhance and improve                                     REFERENCES

our solid waste  management  practices  to  prevent  the  1.  Nyangababo,  J.T.  and  J.W.  Hamya,  1980. contamination of surface as well as ground water quality.          The Deposition of Lead, Cadmium, Zinc and Copper

from Motor Traffic on Bradaria Enimi and Soil along

CONCLUSION                                                    a mojor Bombo Road. Int. J. Environ. Stud. Legoi, 1(32): 117.

Based on  the  study,  it  concluded  that  more  than  2.  Buenrostro, O. and G. Bocco, January. Solid Waste 10,000 ton per day of municipal solid waste generated          Management in Municipalities in Mexico: Goals and from the Karachi city. Which is comprises 18 towns and                              Perspectives, Resource. Conserv. Recycl, 39: 251-263.


 

3.       UNEP, 2005. Global Environment Outlock (GEO)  12.  Fatta, D.,  A.  Papadopoulos  and M. Loizidou, 1999. Data Portal, United Nation Environment Programme.                                  A Study on the Landfill Leachate and Its Impact on UNEP,     [Online]     Available:          geodata.              the Groundwater Quality of the Greater area. Environ. Grid.unep.ch/.                                                                                                            Geochem. Health, 21(2): 175-190.

4.       UNEP, 2001. Solid Waste Management, Nepal: State       13.  United   States   Environmental   Protection   Agency of the Environment 2001, United Nation Environment              (USEPA), 1984. Office of Drinking Water, a Programme, pp: 97-118.                                                                                                            Groundwater      Protection      Strategy      for      the

5.       Murtaza,  G.  and  A.  Rahman,  2000.  Solid  waste              Environmental Protection Agency, pp: 11. Management in Khulana city and a Case Study of a                                14.  Saarela, J., 2003. Pilot Investigations of Surface Part CBO: Amader   Paribartan.   In:   Community Based                                  of three Closed Landfills and Factors affecting them Solid  Waste  Management:  The  Asian  Experience.                              environ.Monit.Assess, 84: 183-192.

Waste Concern, Dhaka, Bangladesh.                                 15.  Abu-Rukah,   Y.   and   O.   Al-Kofahi,   2001.   The

6.       Misra, V. and S.D. Pandey, 2005. Hazardous Waste,            Assessment of the Effect of landfill Leachate on Impact on Health and Environment  for  Development                                     ground-Water  Quality-A  Case   Study.   El-Akader of Better Waste Management Strategies in Future in                              Landfill Site-North Jordan, Arid Environ, 49: 615-630. India. Environment International, 31(3): 417-431.                   16.  Looser, M.O., A. Parriaux and M. Bensimon, 1999.

7.       Elizabeth,  1998.    Incorporating    the  environment         Landfill  Underground  Pollution  Detection   and into  Municipal  Solid  Waste  Planning:  Life  Cycle           characterization Using Inorganic Traces. Water res., Inventory    Tools    Paper    Presented    at    System                33: 3609-3616.

Engineering Model  for  Waste  Management.  17.  Christensen, J.B., D.L.  Jensen,  C. Gron, Z. Filip and International  Workshop    in     Goteborg    Sweden,                         T.H.  Christensen,  1998.  Characterization  of   the pp: 25-26.                                                                                                            Dissolved  Organic  Carbon  in  Landfill  Leachate-

8.       Jurczak,   G.M.,   2003.           The                                 Relation   between           Polluted Groundwater, Water Res., 32: 125-135. Education, Knowledge and Action for Better Waste    18.  DeRosa,  E.,  D.  Rubel,  M.  Tudino, A.  Viale  and Management  in  Poland.  Waste  Management  and                   R.J. Lombardo, 1996. The Leachate Composition of an Research, 21: 2-18.                                                                        Old   Waste   Dump   Connected   to   Groundwater:

9.       Woodard, R., M.K.  Harder  and N. Stantzos, 2004.       Influence of the Reclamation Work. Environ. Monit. The  optimization  of  Household  waste  Recycling         Assess, 40(3): 239-252.

centers  for  Increased  recycling-A  case  Study  in   19.  Flyhammar,   P.,   1995.   Leachate   Quality   and Sussex,  UK,  Waste  and  Energy  Research  Group         Environmental Effect at Active Swedish Municipal (WERG), School of the Environment. University of                               Landfill, in: R. Cossu, H.T. Christensen and R. Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton, Sussex, UK.                                                       Stegmann (eds) Regulations, Environmental Impact

10.    Suocheng,  D.,  K.W.  Tong  and  W.  Yuping,  2001.   and Aftercare. Proceedings Sardiia 95, Fifth Municipal Solid Waste Management in china: Using                                                       International Landfill Symposium. Vol.III, Sardinia, Commercial management to solve a growing problem.                                 Italy, pp: 549-557.

Utilities policy, 10: 7-11.                                                       20.  Pak-EPA, Guidelines for Solid Waste Management,

11.    Dong, S.S., K.W. Tong and Y.P. Wu, 2001. Municipal             Pak-EPA in Collaboration with JICA, Ministry of Solid waste Management in China: Using Commercial                               Environment, PEP and UNDP (2005).

Management to Solve a Growing Problem. Utilities   21.  Ahmed   Noman   and   Chris    Zurbrugg,    2002. Policy,  10,  7-11.  http://  china  5e.com/dissertation/                Urban   Organic   Waste   Management   In   Karachi,


naturalgas/0058.htm (in Chinese).                                             Pakistan.   28th pp: 18-22.


WEDC    Conference    in   Kolkata,

Items/Model TS10(PLC) TS20(PLC) TS30(PLC) TS50(PLC) TS100(PLC)
Burn Rate (Average) 10 kg/hour 20 kg/hour 30 kg/hour 50 kg/hour 100 kg/hour
Feed Capacity(Average) 20kg 40kg 60kg 100kg 200 kg
Control Mode PLC PLC PLC PLC PLC
Combustion Chamber 100L 210L 330L 560L 1200L
Internal Dimensions 50x50x40cm 65x65x50cm 75x75x60cm 100x80x70cm 120x100x100cm
Secondary Chamber 50L 110L 180L 280L 600L
Smoke Filter Chamber Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Feed Mode Manual Manual Manual Manual Manual
Voltage 220V 220V 220V 220V 220V
Power 0.5Kw 0.5Kw 0.5Kw 0.7Kw 0.7Kw
Oil Consumption (kg/hour) 5.4–12.6 7.8–16.3 10.2–20 12.1–24 14–28
Gas Consumption (m3/hour) 6.2–11.4 8–15.7 9.8–20 9.9–26.1 10–32.2
Temperature Monitor Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Temperature Protection Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Oil Tank 100L 100L 100L 100L 200L
Feed Door 30x30cm 45x40cm 55x50cm 70x55cm 80x60cm
Chimney 3Meter 3Meter 5Meter 5Meter 10Meter
Chimney Type Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel Stainless Steel
1st. Chamber Temperature 800–1000 800–1000 800–1000 800–1000 800–1000
2nd. Chamber Temperature 1000-1200 1000-1200 1000-1200 1000-1200 1000-1200
Residency Time 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec. 2.0 Sec.
Gross Weight 1500kg 2200kg 3000kg 4500kg 6000kg
External Dimensions 140x90x120cm 160x110x130cm 175x120x140cm 230x130x155cm 260x150x180cm